Classic 350 owner tempted by the Speed 400, worth the jump?
@pranav_bhat · 6 days ago
Been riding my Classic 350 for daily use and short weekend runs, no complaints so far. But saw this comparison on Bikewale where the Speed 400 is about 46k costlier on road, and the power figure is almost double what the Classic makes. Not planning anything immediate but curious, has anyone here actually ridden both back to back? Is the extra money worth it for someone who mostly does city plus occasional ghat roads, or does the Classic still make more sense once you add running costs and service network into the picture?
https://www.bikewale.com/compare-bikes/royalenfield-classic-350-vs-triumph-speed-400/
Sources
Replies (1)
ananya_kulkarni· 6 days agoPranav, haven't ridden the 400 so can't compare feel. But for ghat runs twice the power sounds nice till you think of tyre and chain kit costs, those will be way higher than Classic's. Service network is the real question for me, RE has outlets everywhere, not sure Triumph does outside metros. Would factor that before the power figure tbh.
